more_reports

Get the Latest Investment Ideas Delivered Straight to Your Inbox. Subscribe

The Case for Nuclear Power

Share on Stocktwits

Source:

Economists, environmentalists and energy consumers find incentives to start building new plants, according to a recent San Francisco Chronicle article by G. Pascal Zachary.

Economists, environmentalists and energy consumers find incentives to start building new plants, according to a recent San Francisco Chronicle article by G. Pascal Zachary.

A quarter-century ago, I spent many months shuttling back and forth to a small town near San Luis Obispo, joining thousands of protesters opposed to a nuclear power plant named Diablo Canyon that was being built on an earthquake fault on a picturesque stretch of Central California's coastline.

Although far more expensive than anticipated, the plant was put into service by its owner, Pacific Gas and Electric Co., in 1985. Repeated shakers, including a large quake last year, never interfered with the plant's electricity output, which has steadily improved through the years.

Diablo, once dismissed by critics as superfluous, is now an essential part of the state's energy mix. The only other nuclear plant in the state is San Onofre in San Diego County, near San Clemente.

I don't regret my youthful opposition to Diablo. Back then, nuclear plants were badly run and uneconomical, and the near-disaster at Three Mile Island exposed nuclear regulations as a sham. But much has changed in the past 25 years, and for a variety of reasons I think nuclear power deserves another chance.

Get Our Streetwise Reports' Resources Report Newsletter Free and be the first to know!

A valid email address is required to subscribe